Explorar el Código

ci(pre-commit): finalise `rstcheck` configuration [skip ci]

* Automated using https://github.com/myii/ssf-formula/pull/267
pull/28/head
Imran Iqbal hace 4 años
padre
commit
6c09627324
Ninguna cuenta vinculada a la dirección de correo electrónico del committer
Se han modificado 2 ficheros con 4 adiciones y 3 borrados
  1. +1
    -0
      .pre-commit-config.yaml
  2. +3
    -3
      docs/TOFS_pattern.rst

+ 1
- 0
.pre-commit-config.yaml Ver fichero

@@ -44,4 +44,5 @@ repos:
hooks:
- id: rstcheck
name: Check reST files using rstcheck
exclude: 'docs/CHANGELOG.rst'
args: [--report=warning]

+ 3
- 3
docs/TOFS_pattern.rst Ver fichero

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ Example: NTP before applying TOFS

Let's work with the NTP example. A basic formula that follows the `design guidelines <http://docs.saltstack.com/en/latest/topics/development/conventions/formulas.html>`_ has the following files and directories tree:

.. code-block::
.. code-block:: console

/srv/saltstack/salt-formulas/ntp-saltstack-formula/
ntp/
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ We can make different templates coexist for different minions, classified by any

If we decide that we want ``os_family`` as switch, then we could provide the formula template variants for both the ``RedHat`` and ``Debian`` families.

.. code-block::
.. code-block:: console

/srv/saltstack/salt-formulas/ntp-saltstack-formula/ntp/files/
default/
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ Using sub-directories for ``components``

If your formula is composed of several components, you may prefer to provides files under sub-directories, like in the `systemd-formula <https://github.com/saltstack-formulas/systemd-formula>`_.

.. code-block::
.. code-block:: console

/srv/saltstack/systemd-formula/
systemd/

Cargando…
Cancelar
Guardar